September 9, 2004
-
The following is a response to a comment left on my last blog. I really love the comments people leave, especially the ones that make me think about why I believe the things I believe. I appreciate the clarifying experience that brings. This is only a response, not an attack, and hopefully it is offered as respectfully as the comment was offered.
The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, The Constitution of the United States of America
Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
The above is why we should not have tax vouchers to pay for private school education or for any other personal expense. Taxes are collected to provide tor the common good of the citizens. Tax money no longer belongs to the individual who paid the taxes. It is to be spent on services which benefit all and are available for all. People who choose other services, such as private schools, have the right to make that choice, but they also have the responsibility to pay for it.
Private schools are chosen because they offer something that public schools do not offer but that the citizen making the choice wants. Often this is religious education. It may also be another special interest, such as an emphasis on fine arts or a program for highly gifted or talented students. In any case, private schools meet a need not present in the population as a whole.
Public schools, on the other hand, serve the needs of all students. They “promote the general welfare” by making sure that every student has the opportunity to be educated and to become a self-sufficient citizen if that is possible. They provide basic education and usually offer exposure to athletics and the arts so that students can explore talents and interests in these areas. They prepare students for work or for post secondary education. All of this is very important if we are going to have productive citizens in the future.
Public school education is available for everyone. It has a cost which must be paid. Choosing not to use the service does not excuse taxpayers from paying for it anymore than choosing not to use any other tax funded service excuses citizens from paying for it. For instance, I cannot demand movie vouchers for the tax dollars used to support the park system because I prefer movies as a form of recreation. That’s an absurd example, but hopefully it makes my point. If enough money was taken from the park system to pay for movie vouchers, we would no longer have parks because we would not be able to afford them.
In a more frightening example, I cannot take the part of my taxes that pays for medicare and use it to pay for the part of my own health care not covered by my insurance, nor can I take the part of my taxes that pays for nursing home care for the elderly and use it to pay my mortgage. At present, I do not use those services, but I pay for them anyway, because at some point I may need them. It is also possible that I will never need them. But the services are there and they must be funded. Individuals cannot make decisions on how “their tax dollars” are spent because those tax dollars are no longer theirs. They belong to the collective citizenry of the United States to be used for the good of all. E Pluribus Unum.
Comments (12)
This is a really good argument and I respect you for this view. However, I don’t share it (hey, there’s a big surprise). There are actually some good constitutional challenges to vouchers but most of them are based on the separation of church and state. For example, they used this argument to overturn Florida’s state-wide voucher system. I believe in school choice and that competition is good for schools. We already have charter schools which use tax money to offer an alternative to public education. I also believe that vouchers help those who need it the most; those who are trapped in inner city schools with no chance of a good education. I think we need to try some drastic measures to help our schools. Vouchers could be just one of them.
A interesting argument here . I have to say that the voucher system seems just alot of paper work . Here the government in the past has tried to give more choice to parents but all you get is that everyone wants to go to the “good ” school . The answer is to good local school schools .
Here we have lots of catholic schools which the church pays for the outside and the goverment pays for the inside ( teachers etc ) The church money comes from the collection on a Sunday so there is the argument why should people with out children pay for this , also why should churchgoers pay for children who are in the school and never go to school
I totally agree with you about taxes. Public schools are necessary and should be supported. Private schools have scholarships for those in need (not only athletes),and really do not want to replace public schools. Taxes are paid for police and fire protection even if you never need the services.
I totally agree with you about taxes
Hey!!
You make really great points!!! Thanks so much for sharing them!!
Thank you also for your kind words at my site, too!! I really appreciate it!
Hope you have a super weekend!!
Hugs!!
Shara
In France the school is public . But there are also private schools that date from … Charlemagne that asked Church to teach . For the catholic shools or protestant schools or jewish schools the teaching is the same than in public school and the religious education is only a proposition . So that the private schools tend to become public schools !!! ( but they are to maintain their buildings on their own )
Love
Michel
I agree with you. Here we have so many school districts, richer side of town vs. poorer side, that I can’t help wondering if one school district wouldn’t be better. Some of our school boards are rife with scandal.
They also are taking money from richer school districts in TX to give to poor ones and that isn’t working either… so there middleaged guy!
You make a very good arguement … so good, in fact, that I have “borrowed” it (with attribution) and placed it in my “Am’s rAMbles” Blogger Weblog and my Am0 LiveJournal, both accessible by links from my Am0.us site. If, for any reason, you object to my having taken the liberty of copying your text, please let me know and I will remove the offending material from my sites.
Hey!
Just dropping by again super quick to say Hi, and to add you to my subscription list.
Hope you have a super weekend!!
Hugs!
Shara
Very good presentation, although I disagree on one point. The earnings don’t belong to the gov. We have no choice but to give it up and we have little to say about how it is spent. I would agree that we need good public schools, but alas, the system has gone awray.
Awww, Nancy, thanks for the comment at my site! I really appreciate it, and I loved hearing about your precious pets, too!! They sounded so darling!!
Hope you have a great Sunday!!!
Love & Hugs!!
Shara
P.S. Thanks for subscribing to me, too!
Thanks for the welcome back…Spot